Andreas Ittner stated in no uncertain terms: “The importance of higher risk buffers in the banking sector is the lesson we have learned from the crisis – and not merely a ‘fad’! They are intended to make the banking sector more stable and ensure the sustainable availability of funding for the business sector.”
Walter Rothensteiner gave the opinion that the flood of regulatory provisions for banks had become almost too much to cope with: “We are currently sending about 5000 pages of statistics to 15 different regulatory authorities every month. It is almost impossible to avoid missing something somewhere. The present legal situation makes it possible to impose penalties for things that no one understands.” Rothensteiner continued: “In Austria there is a general lack of understanding for the finance industry. There is a danger that the assumption of risk will be criminalised.”
As Andreas Treichl sees it, the banks are in a better position than ever before, thanks to Basel III. He believes, however, that the timing is a problem, because there have been no fundamental improvements for the business sector. Entrepreneurs need incentives if they are to invest. But the banks have become more expensive and are unable to provide any positive incentives at the moment. “We have to accept the fact that the times have changed for banks and that there is a good reason why it is more difficult for banks to obtain capital than before,” Treichl said. “However, in the old days banking was a highly respected profession and it was not possible in any industry to be only mediocre. The banks have finally been called upon to do something about this. If a bank is inefficient, the problem has to be professionally solved.”